An Analysis of Lexmark (LXK) financial articles
March 28, 2024 Financial Portal Free Newsletter Bookmark Financial Portal Advertise Here Submit Your Article Other Financial Articles

Main Menu

Financial Polls
Financial Quotations
Financial Articles (Index)
Financial Articles (Categories)
Bank Directory
Gold Price Change
Silver Price Change
Platinum Price Change
Palladium Price Change
Rhodium Price Change
Copper Price Change
Nickel Price Change
Specialty Metals
Other Metals
Currency Rate Charts
Taxe Rates Worldwide
BTC USD
EUR USD
EUR GBP
EUR CHF
EUR JPY
EUR CAD
EUR AUD
USD EUR
USD GBP
USD CHF
USD JPY
USD CAD
USD AUD
EUR vs. Other Currencies
USD vs. Other Currencies
GBP vs. Other Currencies
AUD vs. Other Currencies
NZD vs. Other Currencies
DOWJONES Index
NASDAQ Index
NYSE Index
NIKKEI Index
FTSE 100 Index
TSX Index
CAC 40 Index
DAX Index
HUI Index
XAU Index
AEX Index
Index Reports
Housing Price Index
Oil Price Charts
Gas Price Charts
Commodity Charts
Meat & Livestock Charts
Softs & Tropicals Charts
Grains Charts
Mortgage Rate Reports
US Interest Rate
World Interest Rate
Inter. Stock Exchanges
NY Stock Exchange
AMEX
Philadelphia Stock Exch.
London Stock Exchange
Euronext Lisbon
Korea Stock Exchange
Deutsche Borse Group
Hong Kong Stock Exch.
Toronto Stock Exch.
Debt Collection Agencies
Insurance Companies in Ireland
Insurance Companies in UK
Insurance Companies in USA
Consulting Companies
Plastics Charts
Trade Organizations
Advertise For Free!
Scam Letters
Other Business Resources


An Analysis of Lexmark (LXK)

By Geoff Gannon,
a full time investment writer,
Gannon On Investing

ghg1924[at]yahoo.com
http://www.gannononinvesting.com

Advertisements:



Copyright © 2006 Geoff Gannon

In 2005, Berkshire Hathaway bought about a million shares of Lexmark. I haven't followed this story closely, but I assume the stock was purchased by Lou Simpson rather than Warren Buffett. I have only two reasons for believing this: the total purchase was small relative to Berkshire's investable assets and the Lexmark purchase is typical of Simpson's investment philosophy (or at least, what little I can glean about his investment philosophy from his past purchases). Regardless of who actually makes the purchases, a new Berkshire holding always draws a lot of commentary.

The commentary on Lexmark has been almost uniformly negative. Even many value investors have a very dim view of Lexmark at these prices. Now, I am not a contrarian investor. Psychology and sentiment do not enter into my considerations at all. I've bought stocks trading near five year lows, and I've bought stocks trading near five year highs. I just try to be rational. I'm not afraid to agree with the consensus, if it's an accurate representation of reality. Here, it isn't. The model of Lexmark that has emerged in my mind over the past few weeks bears little resemblance to the Lexmark I've seen described elsewhere.

Most of the negative comments about Lexmark have focused on the consumer segment. Yet, more than 75% of Lexmark's profits come from the business segment. The business segment is Lexmark's franchise. There, the company has managed to build a moat, not a very wide moat, but a moat nonetheless. Lexmark is the only focused, integrated printing company of any consequence. It understands its business customers' needs, and provides specially tailored solutions that none of its competitors can offer. Worldwide, some very large companies use Lexmark's products for some very specialized tasks. Among these are retailers, banks, and pharmacies. Lexmark has complete control of their product including the printing technology itself and the software used to manage its printers (i.e., to interface with the user's computer). Businesses that care about getting these specialized tasks done right (and getting them done cheap) use Lexmark.

Even Lexmark's competitors have to concede the fact that Lexmark knows printing better than anyone else. Lexmark is the only company that develops its own ink – jet, monochrome, and color laser technologies. It is a vertically integrated printer business like no other. The two competitors most often mentioned as threats to Lexmark are HP and Dell. While everyone will suffer from deep price cuts; I think it's HP and Dell who should be scared.

Lexmark has the much stronger competitive position. For years to come, it will be launching the best printing products for high ink consumption tasks. Lexmark hasn't been focused on competing directly with these companies in the consumer segment; that's going to change because of the emerging photo printing market.

Lexmark isn't interested in selling hardware. It's interested in selling ink. Now that there is real demand emerging for high quality printing within the home, Lexmark is going to start going after the consumer market. Over the next few years, Lexmark will be selling more printers in this segment. A few years after that, the company will see strong recurring revenues from ink sales.

Generic ink cartridges are the biggest threat to the high margin printing business. However, I believe, of all the players in this industry, Lexmark will be the least affected. Its highest margin sales are its most insulated sales. Its lowest margin sales, in its least dominant businesses, are where generic ink will hurt the most.

There is also some concern that Dell could always move away from using Lexmark printers. Let them. From what I can see, sales to Dell will not be a particularly significant high free cash flow margin business. There's no benefit to the Lexmark brand either. That brand is going to become stronger over the next decade, because the quality is already there. Lexmark simply hasn't been that visible to consumers. The Dell deal doesn't help build the Lexmark brand. Honestly, I wouldn't be terribly troubled if Lexmark's sales to Dell dropped to zero tomorrow. Such an occurrence would not materially affect my valuation of Lexmark.

As far as I can tell, Lexmark's management is excellent. They understand the printer business better than anyone (they also happen to understand the science of printing better than anyone – CEO Paul Curlander has a PhD in electrical engineering from MIT). Lexmark's management also sees highly profitable opportunities in printing long – term, despite a very competitive situation short – term. I agree with that assessment.

Within the printer business, there is a real danger of ferocious price competition. However, I do not believe there is a real danger of prolonged ferocious price competition. Lexmark is the company best positioned to weather the storm. It will generate tons of free cash flow, none of which has to be siphoned off to other lines of businesses, as it does at all of Lexmark's competitors. Lexmark's high free cash flow margin recurring revenue stream will supply it with more than enough ammunition to outlast its competitors. They may be deep pocketed, but eventually, they will have to answer to Wall Street. Long – term, they can't compete with Lexmark. It will take them some time to realize that. But, Lexmark has the time.

That's my assessment of Lexmark on qualitative grounds. How does the stock look quantitatively?

The stock is selling for about 15 times earnings and 10 times cash flow. Right now, a dollar of Lexmark's stock buys you a dollar of sales. I think that's a bargain. Not many companies of this caliber sell at a price – to – sales ratio of one.

For the last ten years, Lexmark's return on equity has not fallen below 20%. During the same period, the company's return on assets never fell below 10%. The free cash flow margin has generally been in the 5 – 10% range.

I wouldn't be surprised to see Lexmark's ROE and free cash flow fall substantially in the next few years. However, long – term, I believe a return on equity of 15 – 20% and a free cash flow margin of 8 – 10% are sustainable. In fact, if I was forced to pick an exact ROE that Lexmark could sustain I would pick 20%. But, I would also caution you not to expect that for the next five years or so.

The important estimate is the 8 – 10% free cash flow margin. That's the best way to value Lexmark. At one times sales, you have an 8 – 10% yield, if you think sales can be sustained. If you think sales can grow, you have to factor that into your analysis. At present, a discount rate of 8% seems appropriate.

I never do a discounted free cash flow analysis on this blog, because I feel the variables that go into are something you have to decide on for yourself. I don't want to slap an exact figure on the value of a company, because I don't want to suggest that kind of precision. But here, you can clearly see how I'd value Lexmark. I gave you what I think Lexmark's free cash flow margin will be (8-10%), you know what Lexmark's sales are ($5.4 billion), and I gave you the discount rate I thought was most appropriate (8%). The only necessary variable I haven't provided is a sales growth estimate, and I'm not going to provide that, because I don't want you to think it has anything to do with the next five years.

It doesn't. I'm looking at this company well beyond that point, and I like what I see. Lexmark will strengthen its brand (with consumers), and people will still be printing. So, yes, I am projecting revenue growth for Lexmark; and yes, it is enough to suggest Lexmark is worth substantially more than $5.5 billion.


Geoff Gannon is a full time investment writer. He writes a (print) quarterly investment newsletter and a daily value investing blog. He also produces a twice weekly (half hour) value investing podcast at: http://www.gannononinvesting.com



Published - April 2006











Free Newsletter

Subscribe to our free newsletter to receive news and updates from us:

 

Polls at Financial-Portal.com :

Poll #039
Will USA announce default on its debt?

Poll #036
Is there a secret world government?

Poll #034
Do you know that money is a good servant but a bad master?

Poll #033
Is Forex similar to gambling?

Poll #032
What is your occupation?

Poll #031
Do you ever spend money for things you can do without?

Poll #030
Do you know that it is extremely hard for a rich person to enter the Kingdom of God?

Poll #029
Why do you want to earn more money?

Poll #028
Are you determined and working hard to get out of debt?

Poll #026
What is your net yearly income (after taxes), USD?

Poll #024
What percentage of your income goes for paying your debts off?

Poll #023
What percentage of your income do you save?

Poll #021
What is the first step one should make to get out of debt?

Poll #018
Have you noticed that the more you give, the more you get?

Poll #017
What part of your income do you donate to charities?

Poll #016
What part of your income do you donate to Church?

Poll #015
What is the most important thing in getting out of debt?

Poll #014
What country has the healthiest (the most stable, reliable, and promising) economy?

Poll #013
Do you think credit cards are useful or harmful for people (not for bank owners)?

Poll #010
What currency is the strongest - in the long run (for the next 10-30 years)?

Poll #009
Do you have any savings?

Poll #008
Do you have any debts?

Poll #007
What is your religion?

Poll #005
What country are you from?

Poll #004
Do you think cash will eventually be removed from circulation?

Poll #003
What investment brings the highest profits with lowest risk?

Poll #002
What is the most reliable way to save money?

Christianity

Copyright 2004-2024 © by Financial-Portal.com
Legal Disclaimer